A proposal program that won $269M at a 75% rate — starting from zero
Hired to improve proposals with no background in construction, bidding, or proposal writing. Within one bid season I was researching, writing, and designing every submission alone: 24 proposals, 18 won, $269M in contracts from $337M pursued. None late, none disqualified.
What I walked into
Edwards is a three-decade-old family general contractor competing for public work — school districts, community colleges, municipal projects — against firms many times their size. In public bidding the proposal is often the only thing an owner sees before deciding who is on the short list. Theirs did not look like the work they were capable of.
I had never written a proposal, never worked in construction, and did not know what a lease-leaseback was. That is worth stating plainly, because the record below is what happened after.
Learning it
Public agency solicitations are unforgiving in a very specific way: they are compliance documents before they are sales documents. Miss a required form, misread a submission deadline, exceed a page limit, and it does not matter how good the argument is — you are disqualified before anyone reads it.
So I learned the mechanics first. RFP and RFQ structure, evaluation criteria and how points are actually allocated, lease-leaseback and design-build delivery, bonding, prequalification, and the submission logistics that decide whether a proposal is even opened.
Then the argument. What a school district is really worried about when it hands a campus to a contractor for eighteen months with children on site. What makes a project executive's schedule credible rather than optimistic. Why the safety record matters more than the price on some jobs and less on others.
How the work ran
I researched, wrote, and designed every proposal. I directed the estimator on pricing and the project executives on schedules and build-specific strategy, then assembled their input into one document that argued a single case rather than reading like four people writing separately.
I also rebuilt what they were working from — the proposal, presentation, and document template library, along with the brand story behind it, so that every submission looked like it came from a company that had its act together. That rebrand is its own project →
The record
A 75% win rate by count, and 80% by contract value. Wins included a $60M school reconstruction, a $60M university housing project, a $16M aquatic center, a $16M performing arts theater, and a $20M new junior high school.
All six losses came from a single school district where the firm held no incumbent standing — an owner that tends to select from a short list of contractors it already works with. Outside that one owner, the record was 18 for 18.
Why it worked
Two things, and neither is complicated.
The first is that a proposal is a design problem as much as a writing problem. Evaluators read dozens of these under time pressure. A document that makes its case visually — that lets someone find the answer to their scoring question without hunting — scores better than a denser, more thorough document that makes them work.
The second is that the compliance discipline is non-negotiable and mostly unglamorous. Nothing was ever late. Nothing was ever disqualified. That is not a talent, it is a system, and it is the floor everything else is built on.